- Despite the fact that the prose you have much more than plays and scripts, you continue to call myself a playwright - It could not be it. Because of education I am the director of dramatic theater, but because of life circumstances (severe hip injury - approx.'s) I had a few years to give up directing, but the desire and capacity remains, the more so that before entering gitis, I have "sinned>> literature. - And yet? - I call myself a playwright, due to certain peculiarities of his style. Now I will explain. Unlike most writers I'm not flying over the "clash>> correcting the events and actions of" heroes>> because with the exception of "First>> push (event, idea, or something like that) is practically the manager of the developments since'm going inside, but never as the main character, but as a minor character or just an observer. - Yes, but here you have retreated from its rules and introduced himself to the novel. Again, I do not Fedor Landrin, so I can safely be called one of the characters in his name. In addition, he appears only in the final and only for the reader to believe in the reality of the situation. - For the same reason you throw some of the storylines, not bringing them to a logical denouement? This is due to the fading of your interest or is it it's your "secret>> intent? Or is it connected with the regime, "the novel-online>>? - You are too fast, and the regime "novel-online>> there is absolutely nothing to do with! Just a second, and perhaps the main feature of my style, the relapse of my directorial career or how you told my "secret intent>>: in other words, I try to fool the reader forecast is on the one hand, and on the other, it allows me to create a" volume>> picture.

Posted by: |